Who We Are
News & Stories
May 25, 2023
May 18, 2023
June 24, 2023
June 29, 2023
August 20, 2023
University Wide Events
No Communication Compromises
Areas of Study
Changing the world
Community & Innovation
Research Experiences & Services
Our Global Presence
Global at Home
Global Learning For All
Your Journey Starts Here
Tools and Resources
Explore Our Campus
Jun 7, 2023
Jun 6, 2023
IRB Review Not Required
Most research conducted for classroom assignments does not meet the definition of human subjects research. It is the instructor’s responsibility to ensure the ethical conduct of research. Classroom research involving collection or utilization of data on human subjects will not require a review from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) if it meets the following conditions:
If your student is doing independent research (e.g., independent study, capstone, thesis, dissertation, etc.), we recommend they submit an application for review with you as a faculty sponsor.
The IRB recognizes that the analysis of de-identified, publicly available data does not constitute human subjects research as defined in federal regulations and does not require IRB review. Some examples of data available from large data consolidation bureaus and consortiums are:
Research that is limited to the analysis of data held by these organizations is not considered human subjects research and does not require IRB review.
Please note, IRB approval cannot be granted retroactively, so research conducted for a classroom assignment without IRB approval can never be used as the basis for a publication. If there is a possibility that the research might be used for a future publication, it is advisable to seek IRB approval.
Oral history is defined by the Oral History Association (OHA) as a method of recording and preserving historical information through interviews with participants in past events and ways of life. Many oral history projects do not need to be submitted for IRB review because they do not seek to contribute to generalizable knowledge and therefore are not “research,” per the federal regulations governing the IRB process. Instead, such projects aim to provide a deep understanding of specific historical events and actions.
On the other hand, some oral history projects do seek to contribute to generalizable knowledge and therefore would be considered research and should be submitted to the IRB. Columbia University’s policy statement on oral history and IRB gives this example: a study of the long-term social impact of the Vietnam War on American culture that includes oral history interviews with veterans (not generalizable knowledge) vs. research using oral histories to gain an understanding of the impact of PTSD on Vietnam veterans as part of a project to allow the researcher to predict what kinds of exposure in war situations lead to the development of PTSD (generalizable knowledge).
Also, IRB review is required for any oral history studies, whether or not they seek to develop generalizable knowledge, posing greater than minimal risk to participants. Minimal risk means that the probability and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater in and of themselves than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests. If the research is more than minimal risk, it should be submitted to the IRB no matter what. Finally, researchers conducting oral history projects for which IRB review is not required may, at their discretion, voluntarily request IRB review if required by granting agencies or for any other reason.
In summary, please submit your oral history project for IRB review if it:
If none of the above conditions holds, then do not submit it for IRB review.
Gallaudet University, chartered in 1864, is a private university for deaf and hard of hearing students.
Copyright © 2023 Gallaudet University. All rights reserved.
800 Florida Avenue NE, Washington, D.C. 20002