Gallaudet University
Who We Are
Our Work
Overview
News & Stories
Jan 26, 2023
Jan 19, 2023
Upcoming Events
November 11, 2022
November 17, 2022
November 19, 2022
University Wide Events
No Communication Compromises
Areas of Study
Schools
Programs
Changing the world
Research
Community & Innovation
Research Experiences & Services
Your Journey Starts Here
Study
Learn
Undergraduate Support
Information
Tools & Resources
Explore Our Campus
Connect
Discover
Influence
Dec 9, 2022
Quick Links
Support
Meet the Team
FAQs
Contact
GU
/
Visual Language and Visual ...
Action & Brain Lab
Neural Correlates of Biological Motion Perception in Sign Language Users
HMB N205E
(202) 651-5085
Email Us
Although widely studied in developing populations, the neural basis of biological motion perception has not yet been studied amongst a group that uses action as their primary mode of communication: sign language users.
We hypothesized that the continuous perception of biological motions used in sign language may mean that native signers show an increased ability to extract relevant action information. With this EEG study, we test whether deaf signers’ (N = 19) sensorimotor systems are differentially sensitive to biological motion presented in two conditions (scrambled vs. unscrambled) compared to hearing non-signers.
We predicted greater central alpha event-related desynchronization (ERD) for the unscrambled condition, due to greater demands on sensorimotor cortices when understanding movement. Everyday actions (e.g., jumping jacks, jump rope) were presented using point-light displays (PLD). Time-frequency activity in the alpha and beta ranges was computed for each condition at frontal electrodes and central sites overlying the sensorimotor cortex.
Paired comparisons showed significantly greater ERD at central electrode sites in response to scrambled PLDs as compared to unscrambled PLDs (p<.05, bootstrapped). This finding suggests that deaf signers may recruit sensorimotor systems more strongly in response to unintelligible actions than coherent action, contrary to our prediction.
Frontal electrodes showed the same pattern of ERD (p<.05, bootstrapped), suggesting that executive functions are involved in parsing scrambled PLDs. The results from deaf native signers were statistically compared to the EEG responses of hearing non-signers.
This work provides the first investigation of sensorimotor EEG in deaf signers during PLD observation.
Associate Professor
Dr. Lorna Quandt