Gallaudet University
Who We Are
Our Work
Overview
News & Stories
Sep 26, 2023
Sep 25, 2023
Sep 22, 2023
Upcoming Events
October 4, 2023
October 5, 2023
University Wide Events
No Communication Compromises
Areas of Study
Schools
Programs
Changing the world
Research
Community & Innovation
Research Experiences & Services
Our Global Presence
Global at Home
Global Learning For All
Global Engagement
Your Journey Starts Here
Admissions
Financial Aid
Explore Our Campus
Connect
Discover
Influence
Directories
Popular Keywords
Explore
Quick Links
Information
Faculty and Staff
FAQs
Contact
GU
/
Petitto Brain and Language ...
Cochlear implants and the brain: The...
Email Us
Controversy abounds on the differences in language experience in the acquisition of spoken language in deaf individuals with cochlear implants (CIs).
Noteworthy is that early exposure to a signed language causes deviance to auditory language tissue development. Related claims are that young children with CIs should not receive early exposure to a signed language for fear that the tissue devoted to auditory processes will be “taken over” by signed language processing.
We ask whether early exposure to a visually signed language negatively impacts and causes neural deviance or abnormality to classic left-hemisphere spoken language tissue development in deaf individuals with early cochlear implantation, including left Inferior Frontal Gyrus (LIFG) and Superior Temporal Gyrus.
We find that early exposed deaf CI individuals showed entirely normal activation in classic LIFG. By contrast, late exposed deaf CI individuals showed greater activation in the right hemisphere. This supports the hypothesis that early sign language exposure facilitates standard language processing and does not cause neural deviance or abnormality in classic left-hemisphere language tissue.
Strong evidence of neural plasticity was not at work—auditory processes were not “taken over” by signed language processing in early sign-exposed individuals with CIs. Instead, their language tissue activity was entirely normal.
Rather than neural plasticity, findings suggest that aspects of left hemisphere language tissue thought to be “auditory” is not, but dedicated to processing particular patterns in natural language.
We conclude that early, not later, exposure to a signed language supports typical, healthy, and normal language development.
Cochlear implants and the brain: The biological basis for language and cognition in infants, children, and adults with cochlear implants